Ji Sung Nam vs Chase Ferguson Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jun at 03:37 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
J. Sung Nam vs C. Ferguson

KOR
1
Win
Played
0
Win

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Nam 1 - 0 Ferguson
They have played 2 sets in total, with Ji Sung Nam winning 2 and Chase Ferguson winning 0. The last match between Ji Sung Nam and Chase Ferguson was at the M25 Changwon, 04-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Hard, with Ji Sung Nam getting the victory 7-6(5) 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Nam | 1 |
Ferguson | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M25 Changwon(06-04-25)
J. S. Nam vs C. Ferguson H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$1,445 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.27% (305-237) | Career Total W/L | 58.33% (91-65) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
6 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
J. S. Nam vs C. Ferguson Match Preview:
- How well do the players perform on their second serve? Ferguson has won 41.01% of points, outperforming Nam, who has secured 36.02% in recent performances.
- Considering return games, who holds the edge? Nam slightly leads with 47.9% of opponent's second serve points won, whereas Ferguson stands at 46.73%.
- On first serve returns, Nam has a clear advantage, winning 31.57% compared to Ferguson's 27.9%, showing better return efficiency.
- Under pressure, Ferguson has saved 50.6% of breakpoints, nearly identical to Nam's 50.24%, suggesting they are equally resilient.
- Who has a better win record over the past year? Ferguson has a 59.09% success rate, slightly higher than Nam's 57.5%.
- On the clay surface, Ferguson excels with a 64% win rate, while Nam shows his best record on hard courts with 58%.
- Thoughts on overall player level? Nam has a higher win percentage of 70% in $10K events compared to Ferguson's 59.09%.
- When considering opponent quality, Nam's adversaries had a higher average rank of 404.23 compared to Ferguson's 441, potentially providing tougher competition for Nam.
- In crucial deciding set moments, Nam narrowly edges out Ferguson, winning 62% of such scenarios against Ferguson’s 60%.
- Which player is better at converting break points? Nam excels with a conversion rate of 47.47%, much more efficient than Ferguson’s 32.73%.
Editorial Prediction (June 4, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent performance trends, Ferguson shows superiority in second serve success rates, implying reliable holding abilities. However, Nam has demonstrated a slightly stronger return game on both first and second serve points, a crucial metric in gaining an upper hand during rallies.
Under pressure, both players exhibit similar capabilities in saving break points, though Nam’s higher breakpoint conversion showcases a decisive edge in capitalizing on key moments. Additionally, Nam’s consistent performance against higher-ranked opponents reflects resilience against stronger competition.
Considering the players' performance on their preferred surfaces, Ferguson's strength lies on clay, while Nam shows adaptability on hard courts. However, their current event history will play an influential role, should they have participated this year. As such, live performance metrics should be reviewed.
Overall, despite Ferguson's consistent match-win percentage, Nam's superior performance in return games and breakpoint opportunities gives him a slight advantage, making him the more likely winner in this upcoming confrontation.
Ji Sung Nam vs Chase Ferguson Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
J. S. Nam vs C. Ferguson H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
13 | Games Won | 10 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
4 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
2:11:36 | Average Match Time | 2:11:36 |
71% (46/65) | 1st Serve % | 66% (66/100) |
72% (33/46) | 1st Serve Win % | 62% (41/66) |
58% (11/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (16/34) |
23% (3/13) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (2/2) |
43% (43/100) | Return Points Win % | 32% (21/65) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
J. S. Nam Recent Matches Played
C. Ferguson Recent Matches Played

J. S. Nam vs C. Ferguson Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.27% (305/237) | YTD Win/Loss | 58.33% (91/65) |
55.75% (684/543) | Sets Win/Loss | 56.57% (198/152) |
52.30% (5944/5421) | Games Win/Loss | 53.68% (1737/1499) |
57.95% (255/185) | Hard Win/Loss | 56.90% (66/50) |
50.00% (28/28) | Clay Win/Loss | 64.00% (16/9) |
48.84% (21/22) | Indoor Hard W/L | 66.67% (4/2) |
33.33% (1/2) | Grass Win/Loss | 55.56% (5/4) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
1018 | Aces Total | 183 |
0.17 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
959 | Total Double Faults | 180 |
1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:14:14 |
580.36 | Average Opponent Rank | 298.62 |
65% (14218/21863) | 1st Serve % | 70% (4991/7083) |
67% (9590/14218) | 1st Serve Win % | 65% (3258/4991) |
49% (3729/7645) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (1081/2092) |
44% (1145/2597) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (321/752) |
43% (9823/22973) | Return Points Win % | 41% (2962/7251) |
0.00% (0/1) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
50.00% (3/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
20.00% (1/4) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
49.53% (106/108) | Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) |
61.71% (195/121) | Futures W/L | 58.33% (91/65) |
56% (295/526) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (90/153) |
100% (4/4) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/1) |
54% (75/140) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 49% (17/35) |
47% (72/152) | Deciding Set Win % | 55% (21/38) |
86% (303/260) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (85/79) |
14% (303/42) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (85/6) |
19% (238/45) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 15% (71/11) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Prediction Of Buyunchaokete Vs Zhizhen H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Basavareddy Vs Cilic H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?

Prediction Of Berrettini Vs Svrcina H2H, Who Will Win At ATP Lynk & Co Hangzhou Open 2025?
